Kotun daukaka kara ta Kwastam, Hana Fitar da Harajin Ayyuka (CESTAT), Hyderabad, kwanan nan ta soke shawarar da ta yanke na sake rarraba kayayyakin Jasmine Biotechnologies da aka shigo da su daga kasashen waje dagatakin zamani ga magungunan kashe kwari.
Kotun ta yanke hukuncin cewa hukumomin kwastam sun kasa bayar da hujjoji masu gamsarwa, masu inganci kuma masu inganci a shari'a cewa kayayyakin magungunan kashe kwari ne ko kuma kayayyakin da aka haramta.
Kotun da ta ƙunshi Kwamishinan Shari'a Angad Prasad da Kwamishinan Fasaha Ak Choteesh sun amince da ƙararraki huɗu masu alaƙa da umarnin Kwamishinan Ɗaukaka Ƙara, Hyderabad.
Takaddamar ta shafi kayayyakin da aka shigo da su daga ƙasashen waje da aka ayyana a matsayin samfurin kare shuke-shuke "Jinbo K Bio-taki/Exodus", wanda ke ƙarƙashin harajin kwastam mai lamba 3101 0099.
Hukumar ta bayyana cewa kayayyakin da aka shigo da su daga ƙasashen waje sun ƙunshi marine da wasu sinadarai masu alaƙa da su. Saboda haka, a ƙarƙashin Dokar Magungunan Kashe Goro ta 1968, dole ne a rarraba waɗannan kayayyakin a matsayin magungunan kashe gobara a ƙarƙashin Babi na 38 dabisa ga rajista.
Hukumomin kwastam sun zargi kasar da bayar da bayanai na karya da kuma karya dokar kashe kwari bisa ga rahotannin dakin gwaje-gwaje daga Cibiyar Noma ta Yankin (RCOF) da ke Bangalore da kuma Cibiyar Fasahar Sinadarai ta Indiya (IICT) da ke Hyderabad.
An kwace waɗannan kayayyaki a ƙarƙashin Sashe na 111(d) da 111(m) na Dokar Kwastam. An kuma sanya tarar a ƙarƙashin Sashe na 112(a) da 114AA.
Duk da haka, kotun ta gano rashin daidaito sosai a cikin rahotannin dakin gwaje-gwaje. Kotun ta lura cewa ɗaya daga cikin rahotannin ya bayyana a sarari cewa "sakamakon binciken bai nuna wani kololuwar da ke da alaƙa da magungunan kashe kwari ba."
"Da zarar dakin gwaje-gwajen ya rubuta rashin kololuwar magungunan kashe kwari, sashen ba zai iya dogara da kasancewar alkaloids na halitta don yanke hukunci cewa maganin kwari ne ba," in ji alkalin.
Kotun ta yanke hukuncin cewa kasancewar alkaloids na halitta kawai ba ya tabbatar da cewa samfurin da aka shigo da shi daga ƙasashen waje maganin kwari ne kai tsaye.
Kotun ta kuma lura cewa hukumar ta gaza bayar da shaida don tallafawa dorewar kayayyakin a kasuwanci, ra'ayoyin kwararru, ko rahotannin bincike na tallatawa - shaida da za ta iya tabbatar da cewa kayayyakin sun sami karbuwa a kasuwanci ko kuma an sayar da su a matsayin magungunan kashe kwari.
Kotun ta ƙara da cewa: "Ma'aikatar ta gaza tabbatar da ɓoyewa ko ɓata suna da gangan. An yi wa dukkan kayayyakin da aka shigo da su rijista bisa ga sanarwar shigo da kaya ta hukuma, tare da bayanin kayayyakin da takardun tallafi masu dacewa. Ba a shigo da waɗannan kayayyaki ta hanyar ɓoye ba."
Kotun ta kuma yanke hukuncin cewa rashin yin tambayoyi ga marubutan rahoton fasaha ya saba wa ka'idar adalci ta halitta.
Alkalin ya ƙara da cewa, "Hukuncin da aka yanke a ƙarƙashin Sashe na 112(a) da 114AA na Dokar Kwastam ba za a iya lamunta su ba kwata-kwata domin babu wata shaida ta hannu da zamba, jabu da gangan ko kuma guje wa biyan haraji da gangan."
Kotun ta yanke hukuncin cewa hukumar ta gaza samar da hujjoji masu gamsarwa, abin dogaro kuma bisa doka don tallafawa ikirarinta, don haka ta gano cewa sake rarraba kayayyakin a karkashin Tarin Kuɗin Kwastam mai lamba 3808 9199 ba shi da tushe.
Don haka, an soke kwace kadarori, tattara haraji, biyan tara, da kuma takunkumin da aka sanya. An amince da daukaka karar.
Lokacin Saƙo: Mayu-19-2026
